Kathmandu, Nepal – Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent remarks on federalism in Nepal have sparked debate across the country. Speaking at a White House conference, Trump labeled U.S. financial aid for Nepal’s federalism initiatives as a “fraud” and dismissed a $19 million grant for biodiversity conservation in the country. His comments have drawn both criticism and support in Nepal, intensifying discussions on the sustainability and effectiveness of federalism.
Trump’s Comments Stir Controversy
Trump’s statements were not limited to Nepal. He also took a swipe at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, calling him a “modestly successful comedian” and a “dictator” for remaining in power without elections. His remarks added to the tension in Ukraine, already reeling from Russia’s invasion. However, it was his unexpected mention of Nepal that caught many off guard.
Nepal, a small South Asian nation, has rarely been a subject of high-level U.S. political discourse. Trump’s comments questioning the credibility of U.S. aid to Nepal have resonated with various political factions, reigniting debates on the country’s federal structure.
Mixed Reactions in Nepal
Trump’s remarks have received mixed reactions within Nepal. While some political leaders and analysts agreed with his criticism of federalism, others strongly opposed his views. Among those addressing the controversy is Kathmandu Metropolitan City Mayor Balen Shah, known for his outspoken nature.
Balen Shah responded to Trump with a bold assertion that Nepal is “better than the United States” in certain aspects. He argued that America’s prosperity is largely due to the hard work of immigrants rather than native-born citizens. He also blamed the continued migration of skilled Nepalis to the U.S. for Nepal’s economic struggles.
Federalism Under Fire
Federalism in Nepal has been a contentious issue since its adoption in 2015. The system was introduced to decentralize power and promote regional development. However, critics argue that it has led to increased bureaucracy, financial burdens, and inefficiencies.
Trump’s comments have emboldened anti-federalism voices, particularly those in the Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP). The RPP has consistently opposed federalism and called for the restoration of Nepal’s monarchy. The party sees Trump’s remarks as validation of its long-standing position that federalism is an unnecessary expense for a developing country.
Balen Shah’s Growing Influence
Balen Shah’s response to Trump has further cemented his image as a bold and independent leader. His tenure as mayor has been marked by decisive actions, such as enforcing building restrictions along riverbanks and improving pedestrian access in Kathmandu.
Despite initial resistance from some political groups, many of his initiatives have gained public support. His policies on urban planning, environmental conservation, and law enforcement have been widely appreciated. His response to Trump aligns with his broader narrative of self-reliance and national pride.
Federalism and Constitutional Amendments
Nepal’s federal structure is currently under review, with discussions on potential amendments to the constitution. The ruling coalition, including the Nepali Congress and the Unified Marxist-Leninists (UML), has been working to address governance issues. However, delays in constitutional amendments have frustrated opposition parties and citizens alike.
Some experts argue that Nepal’s frequent constitutional changes reflect political instability. In contrast, countries like the United States and India have maintained relatively stable constitutions with minimal amendments. Many Nepalese hope that any future constitutional revisions will provide lasting solutions rather than temporary fixes.
Trump’s remarks have once again put Nepal’s governance model under scrutiny. While his words may not directly impact Nepal’s policies, they have reignited a crucial debate on the effectiveness of federalism. Balen Shah’s response has further fueled discussions on national identity, self-reliance, and governance.
As Nepal navigates these challenges, the coming months will be critical in determining the future of its federal system. Will federalism continue to evolve, or will the growing opposition lead to significant structural changes? Only time will tell.
For more updates on Nepal’s political landscape, visit News Xpress Online.
